Lottery Critics


A lottery is a form of gambling in which numbers are drawn at random for prizes. Many governments outlaw lotteries, while others endorse them and regulate them to some extent. In the United States, state lotteries are highly popular and generate billions in revenues for the public coffers. Despite their popularity, lottery critics argue that they promote gambling and undermine the moral fabric of society by exploiting poor people, problem gamblers, and minorities and by encouraging addictive behavior.

The history of lotteries dates back to ancient times, with Moses instructed to take a census of Israel and divide the land by lot and Roman emperors distributing property and slaves by drawing lots. Lotteries became widespread in colonial America, and played a major role in financing both private and public ventures including canals, roads, bridges, churches, schools, colleges, and even fortifications during the French and Indian War.

During the immediate post-World War II period, states were able to expand their array of services without especially onerous taxes on the middle and working classes. But this arrangement began to crumble with the rising cost of the Vietnam War, and by the 1970s, it became clear that lotteries were the only way for many states to generate sufficient revenue to meet their obligations.

In an era of anti-tax sentiment, state government officials have been eager to embrace any revenue source that does not involve raising taxes. Lottery advertising generally portrays the game as a form of entertainment and encourages people to play for fun. But this message obscures the regressivity of lottery revenue and masks the fact that most winners are committed gamblers who spend a significant portion of their income on tickets.

Lottery critics further contend that the games are designed to maximize profits by promoting addiction and regressive taxation. They also point to the fact that the vast majority of lottery revenue is derived from players who are not wealthy and are likely to be minorities or low-income persons. This regressive structure is particularly problematic in an era when the states are faced with a growing deficit.

To counter these criticisms, lottery advocates argue that the games are a legitimate method of raising funds for state-sanctioned public goods and that it is unfair to compare them with traditional taxes. They also point to the fact that lottery revenues have been shown to be less regressive than other sources of state revenue and that most winning ticket holders do not use the prize money to quit their jobs or to purchase luxury goods. But the question remains: does running a lottery as a business and promoting gambling at cross-purposes with the general public interest serve any real purpose?

Posted in: Gambling